Comments on: Famous SAT Scores: Where Does Yours Fit In?

By: If it’s Any Consolation…..SAT Scores of the Rich and Famous | Perfect Score Project

Fri, 27 Jan 2012 22:34:25 +0000

[...] an SAT score list of the rich and [...]

By: Dan

Dan — Thu, 12 Jan 2012 19:40:41 +0000

I doubt O’Reilly got 1585.

I’m sure he did pretty well though. Much as I loathe him, he did go to Harvard. People don’t go to Harvard with a score, of say, 1000.

By: Maura Calija

Maura Calija — Sun, 11 Dec 2011 17:50:25 +0000

I am looking for a clerk position in banking or any company.

By: Izzy

Izzy — Tue, 30 Aug 2011 21:10:32 +0000

I went to school with O’Reilly, Chaminade in Mineola, Long Island. You guys can laugh all you want, call him an ass all you want, say whatever you want. But two things remain true, he’s a hell of lot more successful than you’ll ever be, and he really is, head and shoulders, your intellectual superior. Go ahead, check out some SAT scores for Chaminade graduates, scholarships earned, and National Merit awards.
You leftist clowns continue to live in a place where you believe simply hoping something makes it so. He could probaly kick your pansy asses, too.

By: GFGFG

GFGFG — Sat, 28 May 2011 19:06:50 +0000

Anyone who thinks a total moron like Oreilly got a 1585
on the SAT is even more of a moron than Oreilly. I bet
he didn’t even take the SAT. Beyond that where is the
actual evidence? Produce the actual SAT with the score
1585. What you demand Obama produce his birth certificate but accept at face value some moronic claim that Oreilly scored 1585 in his SAT you retard?

By: KeetonIsAnIdiot

KeetonIsAnIdiot — Tue, 26 Apr 2011 20:49:29 +0000

You’re not a liberal and only and idiot would claim
that “but he is an intelligent well spoken man in his interviews.”. This is a guy who consistently gets taken
in by the most idiotic claims(google “The Paris Business Review”). Only retard would believe most of those SAT
scores and specifically Oreilly. once again you’re an idiot idiot

By: Franklin

Franklin — Sun, 14 Nov 2010 14:19:51 +0000

Not true, I believe that SAT scores were at one time—pre-1974—not necessarily divisible by 10. If you look carefully, the only scores that are not divisible by 10 come from people who clearly took the test before 1974. If you want to see how different IQ estimates are depending on when you took the test, compare Garofalo’s post 1974 score with Namath’s 730 from before 1974 here:

http://www.braingle.com/mind/iq/convert.php?year=1&satm=600&satv=606&grev=&greq=&calculate=Calculate+IQ

(Howard and Namath’s scores were both relatively better than Garofalo’s).

By: Keeton

Keeton — Fri, 03 Sep 2010 15:04:08 +0000

to: LOLLLL_Bill_Oreilly1585_SAT_LOL!!

You are clearly an idiot. I am a huge liberal and Jon Stewart and Cobert are my heroes. That being said Bill O’Reilly most certainly could have attained that score. You may not agree with his points, but he is an intelligent well spoken man in his interviews. I bet he scored well on that test and bombed the “works-well-with-others” test.

By: Polina at University Language

Polina at University Language — Wed, 18 Aug 2010 14:22:18 +0000

As the blog post states, all the information was collected from Time Magazine.

By: LOLLLL_Bill_Oreilly1585_SAT_LOL!!!

LOLLLL_Bill_Oreilly1585_SAT_LOL!!! — Wed, 18 Aug 2010 06:15:06 +0000

‘By pointing out which are conservatively leaning, you have shown your own bias — that conservatives cannot be intelligent. ‘

the question isn’t if conservatives can’t be intelligent. The question is there any way Bill Orelly could have scored 1585? No way at all. I doubt he could have score above 1000. I wonder if he took the test.

Polina. Researching? So tell us what the research consists of? Getting information from other websites that have all peddled along the same disinformation?

Its obviously fake. Only idiots would think this was true.