<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Famous SAT Scores</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.universitylanguage.com/blog/20/famous-sat-scores/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.universitylanguage.com/blog/20/famous-sat-scores/</link>
	<description>The Educated Source for Certified Translation</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 10:00:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: ThanksStumbleUpon</title>
		<link>http://www.universitylanguage.com/blog/20/famous-sat-scores/comment-page-1/#comment-506860</link>
		<dc:creator>ThanksStumbleUpon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2013 19:00:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universitylanguage.com/?p=708#comment-506860</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Found this article via StumbleUpon. Thought it was a little interesting. What I thought was far more interesting is that someone has come back here several times over a span of two years to flame everyone that has attempted to defend Bill O&#039;Reilly. You, sir, deserve a medal, and a brand new coloring book. Stay inside the lines]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Found this article via StumbleUpon. Thought it was a little interesting. What I thought was far more interesting is that someone has come back here several times over a span of two years to flame everyone that has attempted to defend Bill O&#8217;Reilly. You, sir, deserve a medal, and a brand new coloring book. Stay inside the lines</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MoreIdiotRight-wingers</title>
		<link>http://www.universitylanguage.com/blog/20/famous-sat-scores/comment-page-1/#comment-317661</link>
		<dc:creator>MoreIdiotRight-wingers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Apr 2012 00:11:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universitylanguage.com/?p=708#comment-317661</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dan says

&quot;I doubt O’Reilly got 1585.

I’m sure he did pretty well though. Much as I loathe him, he did go to Harvard. People don’t go to Harvard with a score, of say, 1000.&quot;

O’Reilly didn&#039;t go to Harvard as an undergrad. He got a
Master of Public Administration at Harvard which at best might have asked for GRE scores. But a Master of Public Administration wouldn&#039;t be like getting into the Physics program at Harvard where you would expect GRE scores to be high


Bottom line is O’Reilly didn&#039;t come even close to 
a 1585 SAT. NO way]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dan says</p>
<p>&#8220;I doubt O’Reilly got 1585.</p>
<p>I’m sure he did pretty well though. Much as I loathe him, he did go to Harvard. People don’t go to Harvard with a score, of say, 1000.&#8221;</p>
<p>O’Reilly didn&#8217;t go to Harvard as an undergrad. He got a<br />
Master of Public Administration at Harvard which at best might have asked for GRE scores. But a Master of Public Administration wouldn&#8217;t be like getting into the Physics program at Harvard where you would expect GRE scores to be high</p>
<p>Bottom line is O’Reilly didn&#8217;t come even close to<br />
a 1585 SAT. NO way</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MoreIdiotRight-wingers</title>
		<link>http://www.universitylanguage.com/blog/20/famous-sat-scores/comment-page-1/#comment-317654</link>
		<dc:creator>MoreIdiotRight-wingers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Apr 2012 00:07:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universitylanguage.com/?p=708#comment-317654</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Oh and

&quot;Go ahead, check out some SAT scores for Chaminade graduates, scholarships earned, and National Merit awards.&quot;

&quot;check out&quot;

You idiot. You just don&#039;t &quot;check out&quot; people&#039;s
SAT score as if they were open to the public.  
You think they work that way? If you think so then 
provide the evidence. Provide a reliable link
of that high school showing Oreilly&#039;s SAT score
.

BTW has Oreilly even mentioned anything about his
SAT score?

Elitot Spitzer and Chuck Schumer have both been on
record as saying they received a 1590 and a perfect 1600 SAT respectively.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh and</p>
<p>&#8220;Go ahead, check out some SAT scores for Chaminade graduates, scholarships earned, and National Merit awards.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;check out&#8221;</p>
<p>You idiot. You just don&#8217;t &#8220;check out&#8221; people&#8217;s<br />
SAT score as if they were open to the public.<br />
You think they work that way? If you think so then<br />
provide the evidence. Provide a reliable link<br />
of that high school showing Oreilly&#8217;s SAT score<br />
.</p>
<p>BTW has Oreilly even mentioned anything about his<br />
SAT score?</p>
<p>Elitot Spitzer and Chuck Schumer have both been on<br />
record as saying they received a 1590 and a perfect 1600 SAT respectively.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MoreIdiotRight-wingers</title>
		<link>http://www.universitylanguage.com/blog/20/famous-sat-scores/comment-page-1/#comment-317644</link>
		<dc:creator>MoreIdiotRight-wingers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Apr 2012 00:02:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universitylanguage.com/?p=708#comment-317644</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Izzy a right-wing idiot said

&quot;and he really is, head and shoulders, your intellectual superior.&quot;

Only an idiot would say that. This is the same idiot
O&#039;reilly who essentially called Robert Reich a communist.

He consistently shows his ignorance by misusing such basic terms like &quot;socialist&quot;, &quot;marxist&quot; or &quot;communist&quot;.

You routinely claims taxes are too high while ignoring
the very easily verifiable fact that taxes as a share of the economy are the lowest since 1950, income taxes are the lowest since 1950 and overall tax burden is the lowest since 1958.

He isn&#039;t just ignorant but damn ignorant on even the most basic facts. He also can&#039;t seem to use basic induction and deduction.


But I&#039;m not surprised that you would be advocating for
Oreilly. I mean an idiot who says &quot;he could probaly kick your pansy asses, too.&quot; would show the same kind
of juvenile idiocy that is so common in Oreilly. An idiot advocating for an idiot. 

No surprises there]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Izzy a right-wing idiot said</p>
<p>&#8220;and he really is, head and shoulders, your intellectual superior.&#8221;</p>
<p>Only an idiot would say that. This is the same idiot<br />
O&#8217;reilly who essentially called Robert Reich a communist.</p>
<p>He consistently shows his ignorance by misusing such basic terms like &#8220;socialist&#8221;, &#8220;marxist&#8221; or &#8220;communist&#8221;.</p>
<p>You routinely claims taxes are too high while ignoring<br />
the very easily verifiable fact that taxes as a share of the economy are the lowest since 1950, income taxes are the lowest since 1950 and overall tax burden is the lowest since 1958.</p>
<p>He isn&#8217;t just ignorant but damn ignorant on even the most basic facts. He also can&#8217;t seem to use basic induction and deduction.</p>
<p>But I&#8217;m not surprised that you would be advocating for<br />
Oreilly. I mean an idiot who says &#8220;he could probaly kick your pansy asses, too.&#8221; would show the same kind<br />
of juvenile idiocy that is so common in Oreilly. An idiot advocating for an idiot. </p>
<p>No surprises there</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: If it&#8217;s Any Consolation&#8230;..SAT Scores of the Rich and Famous &#124; Perfect Score Project</title>
		<link>http://www.universitylanguage.com/blog/20/famous-sat-scores/comment-page-1/#comment-257173</link>
		<dc:creator>If it&#8217;s Any Consolation&#8230;..SAT Scores of the Rich and Famous &#124; Perfect Score Project</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 22:34:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universitylanguage.com/?p=708#comment-257173</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] an SAT score list of the rich and [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] an SAT score list of the rich and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://www.universitylanguage.com/blog/20/famous-sat-scores/comment-page-1/#comment-249510</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 19:40:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universitylanguage.com/?p=708#comment-249510</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I doubt O&#039;Reilly got 1585.

I&#039;m sure he did pretty well though.  Much as I loathe him, he did go to Harvard.  People don&#039;t go to Harvard with a score, of say, 1000.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I doubt O&#8217;Reilly got 1585.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m sure he did pretty well though.  Much as I loathe him, he did go to Harvard.  People don&#8217;t go to Harvard with a score, of say, 1000.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Izzy</title>
		<link>http://www.universitylanguage.com/blog/20/famous-sat-scores/comment-page-1/#comment-164013</link>
		<dc:creator>Izzy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Aug 2011 21:10:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universitylanguage.com/?p=708#comment-164013</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I went to school with O&#039;Reilly, Chaminade in Mineola, Long Island. You guys can laugh all you want, call him an ass all you want, say whatever you want. But two things remain true, he&#039;s a hell of lot more successful than you&#039;ll ever be, and he really is, head and shoulders, your intellectual superior. Go ahead, check out some SAT scores for Chaminade graduates, scholarships earned, and National Merit awards.
You leftist clowns continue to live in a place where you believe simply hoping something makes it so. He could probaly kick your pansy asses, too.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I went to school with O&#8217;Reilly, Chaminade in Mineola, Long Island. You guys can laugh all you want, call him an ass all you want, say whatever you want. But two things remain true, he&#8217;s a hell of lot more successful than you&#8217;ll ever be, and he really is, head and shoulders, your intellectual superior. Go ahead, check out some SAT scores for Chaminade graduates, scholarships earned, and National Merit awards.<br />
You leftist clowns continue to live in a place where you believe simply hoping something makes it so. He could probaly kick your pansy asses, too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GFGFG</title>
		<link>http://www.universitylanguage.com/blog/20/famous-sat-scores/comment-page-1/#comment-124124</link>
		<dc:creator>GFGFG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 May 2011 19:06:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universitylanguage.com/?p=708#comment-124124</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Anyone who thinks a total moron like Oreilly got a 1585
on the SAT is even more of a moron than Oreilly. I bet
he didn&#039;t even take the SAT. Beyond that where is the
actual evidence? Produce the actual SAT with the score
1585.  What you demand Obama produce his birth certificate but accept at face value some moronic claim that Oreilly scored 1585 in his SAT you retard?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anyone who thinks a total moron like Oreilly got a 1585<br />
on the SAT is even more of a moron than Oreilly. I bet<br />
he didn&#8217;t even take the SAT. Beyond that where is the<br />
actual evidence? Produce the actual SAT with the score<br />
1585.  What you demand Obama produce his birth certificate but accept at face value some moronic claim that Oreilly scored 1585 in his SAT you retard?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KeetonIsAnIdiot</title>
		<link>http://www.universitylanguage.com/blog/20/famous-sat-scores/comment-page-1/#comment-111031</link>
		<dc:creator>KeetonIsAnIdiot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Apr 2011 20:49:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universitylanguage.com/?p=708#comment-111031</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You&#039;re not a liberal and only and idiot would claim 
that &quot;but he is an intelligent well spoken man in his interviews.&quot;. This is a guy who consistently gets taken
in by the most idiotic claims(google &quot;The Paris Business Review&quot;). Only retard would believe most of those SAT
scores and specifically Oreilly. once again you&#039;re an idiot idiot]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re not a liberal and only and idiot would claim<br />
that &#8220;but he is an intelligent well spoken man in his interviews.&#8221;. This is a guy who consistently gets taken<br />
in by the most idiotic claims(google &#8220;The Paris Business Review&#8221;). Only retard would believe most of those SAT<br />
scores and specifically Oreilly. once again you&#8217;re an idiot idiot</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Franklin</title>
		<link>http://www.universitylanguage.com/blog/20/famous-sat-scores/comment-page-1/#comment-43746</link>
		<dc:creator>Franklin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Nov 2010 14:19:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universitylanguage.com/?p=708#comment-43746</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Not true, I believe that SAT scores were at one time---pre-1974---not necessarily divisible by 10. If you look carefully, the only scores that are not divisible by 10 come from people who clearly took the test before 1974. If you want to see how different IQ estimates are depending on when you took the test, compare Garofalo&#039;s post 1974 score with Namath&#039;s 730 from before 1974 here: 

http://www.braingle.com/mind/iq/convert.php?year=1&amp;satm=600&amp;satv=606&amp;grev=&amp;greq=&amp;calculate=Calculate+IQ

(Howard and Namath&#039;s scores were both relatively better than Garofalo&#039;s).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not true, I believe that SAT scores were at one time&#8212;pre-1974&#8212;not necessarily divisible by 10. If you look carefully, the only scores that are not divisible by 10 come from people who clearly took the test before 1974. If you want to see how different IQ estimates are depending on when you took the test, compare Garofalo&#8217;s post 1974 score with Namath&#8217;s 730 from before 1974 here: </p>
<p><a href="http://www.braingle.com/mind/iq/convert.php?year=1&#038;satm=600&#038;satv=606&#038;grev=&#038;greq=&#038;calculate=Calculate+IQ" rel="nofollow">http://www.braingle.com/mind/iq/convert.php?year=1&#038;satm=600&#038;satv=606&#038;grev=&#038;greq=&#038;calculate=Calculate+IQ</a></p>
<p>(Howard and Namath&#8217;s scores were both relatively better than Garofalo&#8217;s).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
